Hunter Thompson-“Doctor Gonzo” Where
Are You Now When We Need You?
A link to a Wikipedia entry for
Doctor Hunter S. Thompson, "Doctor Gonzo."
By Frank Jackman
By Frank Jackman
Back in 2008, no, maybe late 2007 Josh
Breslin, the then well-known writer for half the unread alterative journals and
small publication in America now mercifully retired attempted against all caution to seriously comment on the
upcoming presidential election in the United States (mercifully retired for his
gallon of friends who had to subscribe to those alternative and small press
publications and appropriately display them, unread, on their expansive coffee
tables when guests, including Josh showed up for party time). Attempted to in
his small way “pinch hit” for his mentor, the late Doctor Gonzo, the later
big-time lefty journalist Hunter Thompson who had gained a fair share of his fame
from every four years since the ill-fated and ill-starred 1972 campaign where
nice guy Senator George McGovern got pasted by the then current president and
common criminal, one Richard Milhous Nixon, rolling out his wild wind commentary,
Who would be sorely missed having committed suicide for what were apparently
health reasons in 2005 (or maybe not being able to stand what looked like then
a standard brand same old, same old campaign in 2008 where he would begin to
look like the ghost of Teddy White who in an earlier time got tagged with being
the “go to” guy for presidential politics to the exclusion of any other worthy
pursuit).
On the face of the matter the thought
of a big-time drag out knock them down fight for the soul of the Democratic
Party between an insurgent black candidate, Barack Obama, subsequently the
first black president but also the first president whose administration from
start to finish was tied up with wars somewhere despite a still unseemly Nobel
Peace prize to his credit and the first serious woman candidate Hillary
Clinton, former first lady and the wife of most publically acknowledge randy
President since Warren Harding had
seemingly endless possibilities for comment and consideration. And no question
a few well-chosen barbs as well. On the other side, the Republican Party also
had what looked like a real donnybrook for that party’s nomination between
ex-Vietnam prisoner of war Senator John McCain from Arizona and an upstart
Mormon, Mitt Romney out of Massachusetts or someplace it was never clear where he claimed residence, whose
seemingly odd-ball religion with its former history of polygamy (including by
his grandfather or great-grandfather Josh forgot which) and the wearing white
cotton underwear by its devotees had its own feisty possibilities.
Josh did start out like a house afire,
had the Obama black and smart appeal nailed down, saw where Clinton fatigue
would do Hillary in and where Mitt’s inability to not drool in public over the
prospects of getting the nomination despite being “on the one hand, on the
other hand” about every single issue including whether he liked wearing white
cotton boxer shorts or briefs would finally make him a loser. Then in May maybe
before, but not question by May, Josh threw in the towel, publically stated
that what had seemed like the makings of an interesting bourgeois parties
campaign had turned to piss and vinegar. Had all the appeal of a mop.
He abandoned his ideas in a fit of
hubris recognizing as well that it took the stomach of a Hunter Thompson loaded
down with as much dope as he could get down his gills, as much Wild Turkey as
he could syphon down his throat and as much gibberish as he could produce on
whatever new technological gadget he could handle to make his reports to do
justice to the damn thing. Long gone Hunter meant that there was really nobody
who gave a rat’s ass about covering the campaign the way it should be
covered-with a very pinched nose and from a midnight hotel room one hundred
miles from any candidate.
When 2011 came around with a sitting if
then wildly unpopular president in office Josh didn’t even bother to think
about the nerve-wracking possibility that he might slip back, might abandon
that twelve-step program for political junkies which had weened him off such
fruitless endeavors. Then 2015 came along, 2015 the year that Josh had planned
to retire, planned to go back up to Maine and work through a couple of ideas
about that great American novel that due to the urgencies of making enough
money to pay alimony, child support and college educations for his three
divorced wives and his brood of children, and all of a sudden a guy named
Donald Trump came into view, had some kind of serious chance to take the
Republican nomination based on Know-Nothing politics that had not been in play
since about 1856 before the newly emerged Republican Party beat back the
bastards.
Josh toyed and toyed with the idea of
getting back in the ring, of going mano y mano with this cartoonish character
who seemed a natural for the skewer. Then Josh went back to his archives, back
to some comments he made in 2008 and later in 2012 when he abandoned the crummy
little small change of beating up on guys and gals who could give a rat’s ass
about some writer up in Maine holding forth on the issues of the day. The
kicker though was a commentary he had written about the need for the outsized
ego of a Hunter Thompson to do justice to the campaign. Hunter whose blood rose
to the quick when all the bullshit of the campaigns gathered steam would have
loved this low-rent 2016 fight. Here’s what Josh had to say then, and stands by
now when more than ever we need a big foot guy like Thompson to tilt his lance:
Josh Breslin comment:
One
of the beautiful things about commentary on American bourgeois presidential
electoral politics is that with a change of name here, maybe these days an
added gender or two, maybe a longer list of contenders in one contest year than
another, you can “cut and paste” from 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016 (I’m ready) and be
right on point. The following piece from the archives is a case in point. But
the real beauty, as stated in the entry, is that I don’t have to actually vote
for any of them. That, as the credit card commercial says, is priceless.
********
“In
my old age I am getting a little weak-kneed about having to wade through the
basically vacuous blather coming out of the Democratic and Republican
presidential nominating processes. While we are in a little period of
‘doldrums’ before the deluge I keep falling back to the work of Hunter Thompson
on earlier presidential campaigns to try to keep a little sanity. Here’s a
little tribune to the fallen journalist. Damn, Hunter we sure as hell could use
you now. Call me collect from wherever you are. I’ll gladly accept the charges.
Selah.
This
commentary was originally used as part of a review of Hunter Thompson's Songs of the Doomed. Since most of the
points I made in my review of that book apply here I will let that review stand
in for the essential thrust of his whole body of political work. Obviously each
book written by Thompson on the various presidential campaigns is formatted
differently but whether Thompson was skewering the Nixon era, the Reagan era,
the Clinton era or the Bush eras the song is the same. And it was not (and is
not) pretty.
Generally
the most the trenchant social criticism, commentary and analysis complete with
a prescriptive social program ripe for implementation has been done by thinkers
and writers who work outside the realm of bourgeois society, notably socialists
and other progressive thinkers. Bourgeois society rarely allows itself, in self-
defense, to be skewered by trenchant criticism from within. This was
particularly true when it came from a known dope fiend, gun freak and
all-around lifestyle addict like the late, lamented Dr. Hunter S. Thompson.
Although he was far from any thought of a socialist solution and would reject
such a designation we could travel part of the way with him. We saw him as a
kindred spirit. He was not one of us- but he was one of us. All honor to him
for pushing the envelope of journalism in new directions and for his pinpricks
at the hypocrisy of bourgeois society. Such men are dangerous.
I
am not sure whether at the end of the day Hunter Thompson saw himself or wanted
to been seen as a voice, or the voice, of his generation but he would not be an
unworthy candidate. In any case, his was not the voice of the generation of
1968, my generation, being just enough older to have been formed by the
earlier, less forgiving coming of political age in the 1950's. His earlier
writings show his struggle to break out of formalistic journalism.
Nevertheless, only a few, and with time it seems fewer in each generation,
allow themselves to search for some kind of truth even if they cannot go the
whole distance. This compilation under review is a hodgepodge of articles over
the best part of Thompson's career. As with all journalists, as indeed with all
writers especially those who are writing under the gun and for mass circulation
media these works show an uneven quality. However the total effect is to blast
old bourgeois society almost to its foundations. Others will have to push on
further.
One
should note that `gonzo' journalism of which his later work is a prime example is
quite compatible with socialist materialism. That is, the writer is not
precluded from interpreting the events described within himself/herself as an
actor in the story. The worst swindle in journalism, fostered by the formal
journalism schools, as well as in other disciplines like history and political
science is that somehow one must be “objective.”' Reality is better served if
the writer puts his/her analysis correctly and then gets out of the way. In his
best work that was Hunter's way.
As a member of the
generation of 1968 I would note that the 1960s was a period of particular
importance which won Hunter his spurs as a journalist. Hunter, like many of us,
cut his political teeth on one Richard Milhous Nixon, at one time President of
the United States and all- around political chameleon. Thompson went way out of
his way, and with pleasure, to skewer that man when he was riding high. He was
moreover just as happy to kick Nixon when he was down, just for good measure.
Nixon represented the “dark side” of the American spirit- the side that appears
today as the bully boy of the world and as craven brute. Sound familiar? If for
nothing else Brother Thompson deserves a place in the pantheon of journalistic
heroes for this exercise in elementary hygiene. Anyone who wants to
rehabilitate THAT man before history please consult Thompson's work. Hunter, I
hope you find the Brown Buffalo wherever you are. Read this book. Read all his
books.”
Strange that this review could with a
few changes have been written in 2016-JB
No comments:
Post a Comment