Happy, Happy Birthday Brother
Frankenstein-On the 200th Anniversary Of The “Birth” of Mary
Shelley’s Avenging Angel “Frankenstein”-A Comment
A link to a 200th
anniversary discussion of Mary Shelley and her “baby” Frankenstein on NPR’s On Point.
http://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2018/02/12/working-in-the-lab-late-one-night
By Lenny Lynch
We all know in the year 2018 that it is impossible to create
a human being, maybe any being, out of spare stitched up human parts, and a few
jolts of electricity. At least I hope everybody short of say Hannibal Lecter,
Lucy Lane or some such holy goof who thought he or she could “do God’s
handiwork” on the cheap, out of some “how to manual” knows the ropes enough to
have figured that out. You have to go big time MIT scientist and MGH doctor
routes running through DNA, RNA, genetic matching and such to do what back in
the day only a scary primitive amateur guy working in some foreboding isolated
mountain retreat would even dare to contemplate. Back in that 1818 day when
Mary Shelley (she of the thoroughbred breeding via Earth Mother feminist writer
Mary Wollstonecraft and French Revolution-saturated anarcho- philosopher William Godwin and later
channeling Romantic era poet husband Percy Shelley who hung around with
ill-fated heroic Lord Byron and that crowd ) wrote her iconic classis Frankenstein former idea, the stitch and
sew part, seemed pretty far out on the surface and would go on to sell scads of
books to titillate and disturb the sleep of fevered.
I like the Modern Prometheus part of her title better since like
I said science was pretty primitive on that count, not much better that the Greeks
creation from earth’s laden clay process, about the way our brother was put
together in a slapdash manner but provided an impetus to further discovery. Today
where through genetic engineering we have a better understanding of science and
medicine who knows what the possibilities are for good or evil. Although at
times we need to treat science, maybe medicine too, like a thing from which we
have to run. (Example, a very current example, running the rack on discovering
everything there is to know about the atom and then have such a discovery threatening
a hostage world with nuclear weapons once the night-takers latched on to the
military possibilities. At that point running away from the results of the
creation like cowardly Victor Frankenstein doesn’t mean a thing, not a thing.)
Still Mary Shelley was onto something, some very worthy
thoughts about human beings, about sentient and sapient beings, about where
women fit into the whole scheme of things if we can at the flip of a button
create life without human intervention which has already accrued to us today in
marginal cases and probably would have shocked her 19th sensibilities.
A better result if humankind can make itself out of odd spare parts, a little
DNA splicing here and there, that also puts a big crimp in the various ideas
about God and his or her tasks once he or she becomes a sullen bystander to
human endeavor. Not a bad thing not a bad thing at all. But the most beautiful
part of her story is the possibility, once again, that we may get back to the
Garden to retrofit that Paradise Lost
that the blind revolutionary 17th poet John Milton lost his eyesight
over trying to in verse form how we lost our human grace. Yeah, tell us that we
might be able to get back to the Garden. Nice choice Ms. Shelley.
We know, or at least I know, that Frankenstein aka Modern
Prometheus, has gotten a bad rap. Prometheus remember him from subtle Greek
mythology and how he was able to create his brethren out of clay. Nice trick.
Better, the brother did not leave humankind hanging by offering the gift of
fire to move human progress at a faster clip. To keep the race from cold and
hunger. Took a beating from psychopath Zeus for his lese majeste by having to
roll that rock for eternity. Mister Frankenstein really has been misunderstood especially
since the rise of the cinema starting from that first libelous presentation in
1931 which turned him from that misunderstood and challenged youth who was
orphaned by a unfit “father” into a scary monster who made kids afraid on nighttime
shadows on bedroom walls. There are a million ways that piece of bad celluloid got
it wrong but if you will he remember actually learned English, despite being
“born” out in the wilds of 19th century Germany, so movie audiences
could understand what he was saying. Does that sound like a monster to you? I
thought not.
The bad ass in the whole caper is this dolt Victor
Frankenstein, the human so-called scientist who built a thing from which he had
to run like some silly schoolgirl. If the guy had the sense that God, yes God,
gave geese he would not have abandoned his brethren, his avenging angel.
Wouldn’t have started a string of murders for which he not his so-called
“monster” was morally responsible for. Instead the dink just let the bodies
stack up like a cord of wood as he let his “creation” get out of control.
On this site my fellow writer Danny Moriarty has recently
taken it upon himself to smash what he has called the unearned reputation of
one Lanny Lamont, aka Basil Rathbone, aka Sherlock Holmes the so-called
deductive logic detective who also let innocent bodies pile up before he got a
bright thought in his dope-addled head about how to stop the carnage. That
Danny’s take, Danny not his real name by the way but an alias he had been
forced to use to protect himself and his family who have been threatened by a
bunch of hooligans who are cultist devotees and aficionados of this Lanny
Lamont known as the Baker Street Irregulars.
I don’t know enough about the merits of Danny’s crusade to
decide whether he too is also an avenging angel, a blessed brethren in the
fight for human progress against the night-takers, against the “alternate fact”
crowd. But I do know that the idea behind what he is trying to do is solid. In
his case the bare knuckle blowing up of an undeserved legend. This bicentennial
year of the existence our beautiful Mister Frankenstein, the Old Testament
avenging angel, I am proud to defend his honor against all the abuse he has
taken for far too long. That may be a tough road but so be it.
Mary Shelley started something for us to think about on letting
things get out of hand though and now we have to try to put the genie back in
the bottle.
No comments:
Post a Comment