The So-Called Unmasking Of
The Sherlock Holmes Legend, Part IX-Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce’s “Dressed
To Kill” (1946)-A Film Review
DVD Review
By Seth Garth
Sherlock Holmes: Dressed
To Kill, starring Basil Rathbone which is the well-known screen name for the
actor who played Holmes in this British series, Nigel Bruce who did have his
medical license suspended for a time for prescribing too many opium-laced drugs
but who was given a suspended sentence and never saw the inside of Dartmoor
Prison unlike the congenital thief in this film, 1946
[I have mentioned more
times than I care to remember that not everybody who starts out in the film
review, film criticism if you have an academic bent and want to upscale the
profession, makes it to the end. The profession eats its own, has more
treachery per square inch that the denizens of academy with all their
conferences and learned papers and incessant back-biting ever thought off. A
professor, let’s say a professor of cinematic studies, would last about two
minutes in this dog eat dog business. That is why a lot of them spent their two
minutes and then headed fast to the groves of academia.
Like I was telling
somebody recently in dealing with a bunch of fellow reviewers who work at this
publication it was a lot easier in the old days when the studios would pass out
their so-called press releases. You just rewrote from there or if you were
drunk and hungover just signed your name on top either way mercifully you did
not have to actually watch the stinker. Which many of them, too many to count,
were. (My estimate of the ratio is that about one in ten even rates a review
and that might be too high of late.)
All this intro talk to
say that something has happened to Bruce Conan, or whatever name he was using
in this Sherlock Holmes debunking mania he got himself caught up in. The last
review of his I had seen maybe Part Four (I think I saw that his last one was
Part VIII Greg Green supplied the Part IX in the title so assume I was correct)
he was using the name Danny Moriarty so it could have been any name-except his
real one which I will not divulge out of fear for his safety or his wrath if he
resurfaces anytime soon.
When I say the vague “something
has happened to Bruce” that is exactly what I mean. He did not show up at the
Ed Board meeting last week to turn in and have his latest review worked over.
Greg Green asked me to pinch-hit for him. All I know is that Bruce was setting
himself a very tall task trying to bump old Sherlock Holmes down a peg or two.
How many times have I, you, we uttered “elementary, my dear Watson” to some
rattled-brained holy goof who was clueless about everything including which was
his or her left hand. Yes, a tough task indeed. I think the job might very well
have driven him over the edge, he was certainly kind of paranoid when I would
ask him how his crusade was going. Didn’t want to talk about it much and
although he said he trusted me what about the “others” they could be working
for those “damn Irregulars” (his term).
Before the reader goes
off the deep end along with Bruce in conspiracy theory speculation I very much
doubt that the crew known as the Baker Street Irregulars according to him but
who I found out after a little investigation is actually called the Sherlock
Holmes Preservation Society (SHPS) had anything to do with his disappearance. The
SHPS is NOT a group of nefarious criminals, pimps, whores and dope fiends but
well-respected Holmes (and Conan Doyle) scholars. They are very perturbed I
guess would be the word that Bruce has denigrated Holmes and Watson as bullshit
amateur parlor pink private detectives. Incensed that he had “outed” them from
their homosexual closets, something that a spokesperson told me the Society was
well aware of but was keeping private out of respect for their respective relatives
and for the hard fact that it was irrelevant to their adventures in sleuthing. But
that spokesperson also assured me that they would take care of Bruce in the
public prints not in some dark alley like they were agents of the dastardly
Professor Moriarty or like in the old days a group of Stalinist thugs. I
believe them because I think now that I am armed with that information poor
Bruce got caught up in something that was too big for him, something that drove
him over the edge.
That is where the treachery
of the business comes into play. As some readers may know there was a big
internal power struggle inside this publication last year which resulted in a
dramatic change of site leadership and the addition of a watchdog Editorial
Board. The new leadership wanted livelier coverage of, well, of everything from
politics, culture to reviews and that after the rather lax atmosphere toward
the end of the last regime’s time meant to get a bit more edgy. One form of
that edgy feel I am very familiar with and may be the reason that I was
assigned this review is a continuing “battle” between two reviewers here over
who is more representative of the 007 James Bond cinematic character Sean
Connery or Pierce Brosnan. Another manifestation is old time reviewer Sam
Lowell’s reported change of heart about the virtues of Bette Davis as an
actress from Oscar-worthy to nothing but a repetitive same old untamed shrew
and hack actress.
I think fellow film
reviewer Laura Perkins was on to something when she mentioned in that Bette
Davis business that the “boys” were trying to one up each other like in the old
neighborhood where some of them grew up (even if not the same neighborhood the
same ethos, mostly working class). What I called, not her, please, a “pissing
contest.” Bruce a less stable character than the ones that I have mentioned got
himself up in lather as well when he decided to pick on poor misbegotten
Holmes. That unseen pressure and the yardstick that he used to declare who was
a real private detective from the 1930s and 1940s got him in too deep. His
standard, a good one but hardly universal, for a private eye were guys like Sam
Spade and Phillip Marlowe two tough as nails guys who weren’t afraid to throw a
punch, take a slug, take a few whiskey shots from the bottom of a hacked up
desk drawer and bed an off-hand dangerous femme before hand-delivering the
villains personally to the clueless public coppers. Of course the bloodless
Holmes and the hapless and laughable Watson pale by comparison but that was
hardly after all this time a reason to go on the warpath.
A few examples should
close this introduction out until we find out the fate of insecure and frantic
Mr. Conan. He was on fairly safe grounds when he left his “critique” of
Sherlock (whom he called Lanny Lamont after a while which I will get to in a
minute) when he noted that the guy couldn’t hit the side of a barn with a gun,
let the bodies pile up sky high before his vaunted deductive reasoning kicked
in and when he let the public coppers grab the bad guys instead of handling the
task himself. (Bruce went crazy and maybe rightly so when Holmes let some
innocent fourteen year old girl get wasted for no reason except his own sloth.)
Where he went off the track was when he started “investigating” Holmes’
background, started looking at records and such which led him into that Baker
Street Irregular trap.
First off was the not
really surprising fact that Sherlock Holmes was not his real name, nor was
Basil Rathbone a name he used on occasion to keep the bad guys guessing. Bruce
claimed to uncover proof that the guy’s real name was Lanny Lamont who was born
in the slums of the West End of London of an unwed mother who shunted him off to
a charity orphanage. This is where Bruce really started breaking down. The
first crack may have been his “discovery” that nobody named Holmes had ever
lived on Baker Street in London. That suspicious fact led him astray though.
See everybody in London knew that Holmes was an alias but also knew that his
real name was Lytton Strachey, a gentleman born and bred. Bruce was so crazed
to “get the goods” that he traced the trail the wrong way working on that
Rathbone lead. Tough break.
The worst thing though
and here I agree with the Sherlock Holmes Preservation Society’s take on the
matter even if as was obvious to even the most naïve Holmes and Watson were
more than just roommates, were homosexual lovers, today gay, in a time that was
socially and legally dangerous what of it. Pulling this rather cold and
unattractive pair out of the closet just because they didn’t take a run as Sam
did with Brigid or Phillip with some thumb-sucking Candy and a few other dishes
in their professional work. Strangely as well since he admitted openly that if
this was the situation today nobody, including him, would think anything of it.
Would yawn it off. I know Greg Green and a couple of others were concerned with
the allegations and worried about law suits from their respective estates.
Worried too about image having taken early stands in favor of gay rights and
self-sex marriage. Bruce can sort it out if and when he surfaces. For now here
is a straight review of Sherlock Holmes:
Dress to Kill without conspiracy theories and Irregular goblins.
Willie Sutton the
legendary bank robbery cowboy angel rides was often quoted as having been asked
by the coppers after he was caught why he robbed banks. Easy answer when you
think about it-that’s where the money is, or was before all sorts of things
made bank robbing kind of old-fashioned in the brave new world of white collar
fingerless crime. That same premise at one remove is where this Holmes
adventure leads. Why steal bank note plates from the Chancellery of the
Exchequer (Treasury in America)-that’s how to make the money. That is the logic
behind a congenital thief in Dartmoor prison. (Remember neither Holmes nor
Watson spent time there unlike Bruce’s contention that that was where the pair
met and became lovers and partners in crime solutions.)
That thief got them out
of the jail via some three music boxes-not a bad decoy but the damn things
wound up in an auction and sold to highest bidders. The race then becomes
between the clueless Sherlock and the brains of the criminal enterprise that
wants those boxes to unlock a secret code necessary to go into the printing
business in a very profitable way with very low overhead and that criminal . Of
course the idea that the villain, the brains of the operation, is a female would
have had Bruce apoplectic, would have had him beside himself
when Sherlock didn’t make play number one for her before he sent her over. Like
I said a private detective’s love life, of whatever preference, is not germane
to the solution of the crimes. Now this Hilda who ran the operation, played by
Patricia Morison really was a 1940s-style femme and Sam and Phillip would have
a field day with her but she still had to go down, had to take the big step for
her actions, including a fistful of murders along the. Sherlock was able to
snag the last music box and keep the Bank of England from going under in a bale
of counterfeit pounds. The only knock I have on Sherlock’s efforts is that as
Bruce pointed out he lets the bodies pile up before he can figure stuff out. That
and why the hell he has a holy goof like Watson dragging him down.
No comments:
Post a Comment